[GITLAB] - UPGRADE TO v12 on Wednesday the 18th of December at 11.30AM

Commit 55c83b00 authored by Cedric Roux's avatar Cedric Roux

hotfix: bug in rx_pucch

This hotfix does not change the processing at all.
At this point, stat_re == 0, so the behavior is the
same as before. But the code was wrong. There should
have been no test, it's a NACK, period.
parent 365276dc
......@@ -1052,12 +1052,11 @@ uint32_t rx_pucch(PHY_VARS_eNB *phy_vars_eNB,
if (fmt==pucch_format1b)
*(1+payload) = (stat_im<0) ? 1 : 0;
} else { // insufficient energy on PUCCH so NAK
*payload = 0;
((int16_t*)&phy_vars_eNB->pucch1ab_stats[UE_id][(subframe<<10) + (phy_vars_eNB->pucch1ab_stats_cnt[UE_id][subframe])])[0] = (int16_t)(stat_re);
((int16_t*)&phy_vars_eNB->pucch1ab_stats[UE_id][(subframe<<10) + (phy_vars_eNB->pucch1ab_stats_cnt[UE_id][subframe])])[1] = (int16_t)(stat_im);
phy_vars_eNB->pucch1ab_stats_cnt[UE_id][subframe] = (phy_vars_eNB->pucch1ab_stats_cnt[UE_id][subframe]+1)&1023;
*payload = (stat_re<0) ? 1 : 0;
*payload = 0;
if (fmt==pucch_format1b)
*(1+payload) = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment