Commit eb92fa91 authored by matzakos's avatar matzakos

Fixed eNB threading issues creating problems for nfapi emulator.

parent d62f8f93
Pipeline #11389 failed with stage
in 0 seconds
......@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ int pnf_connect(pnf_t* pnf)
address = inet_ntoa(addr->sin_addr);
}
NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_NOTE, "Host address info %d Family:%s Address:%s\n", i++, family, address);
//NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_NOTE, "Host address info %d Family:%s Address:%s\n", i++, family, address);
if (pnf->sctp)
{
......
......@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static uint32_t get_sf_time(uint32_t now_hr, uint32_t sf_start_hr)
{
if(now_hr < sf_start_hr)
{
NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_INFO, "now is earlier than start of subframe now_hr:%u sf_start_hr:%u\n", now_hr, sf_start_hr);
//NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_INFO, "now is earlier than start of subframe now_hr:%u sf_start_hr:%u\n", now_hr, sf_start_hr);
return 0;
}
else
......
......@@ -1203,12 +1203,12 @@ void vnf_handle_ul_node_sync(void *pRecvMsg, int recvMsgLen, vnf_p7_t* vnf_p7)
if(phy->in_sync == 0)
{
NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_NOTE, "***** Adjusting VNF phy_id:%d SFN/SF (%s) from %d to %d (%d) mode:%s zeroCount:%u sync:%s\n",
/*NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_NOTE, "***** Adjusting VNF phy_id:%d SFN/SF (%s) from %d to %d (%d) mode:%s zeroCount:%u sync:%s\n",
ind.header.phy_id, (phy->in_sync ? "via sfn" : "now"),
NFAPI_SFNSF2DEC(curr_sfn_sf), NFAPI_SFNSF2DEC(new_sfn_sf), phy->adjustment,
phy->filtered_adjust ? "FILTERED" : "ABSOLUTE",
phy->zero_count,
phy->in_sync ? "IN_SYNC" : "OUT_OF_SYNC");
phy->in_sync ? "IN_SYNC" : "OUT_OF_SYNC");*/
phy->sfn_sf = new_sfn_sf;
}
......
......@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ eNBs =
////////// MME parameters:
mme_ip_address = ( { ipv4 = "127.0.0.3";
mme_ip_address = ( { ipv4 = "192.168.12.26";
ipv6 = "192:168:30::17";
active = "yes";
preference = "ipv4";
......@@ -181,14 +181,24 @@ eNBs =
NETWORK_INTERFACES :
{
ENB_INTERFACE_NAME_FOR_S1_MME = "lo";
ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_S1_MME = "127.0.0.2/24";
ENB_INTERFACE_NAME_FOR_S1U = "lo";
ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_S1U = "127.0.0.5/24";
#ENB_INTERFACE_NAME_FOR_S1_MME = "lo";
#ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_S1_MME = "127.0.0.2/24";
#ENB_INTERFACE_NAME_FOR_S1U = "lo";
#ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_S1U = "127.0.0.5/24";
#ENB_PORT_FOR_S1U = 2152; # Spec 2152
#ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_X2C = "127.0.0.2/24";
#ENB_PORT_FOR_X2C = 36422; # Spec 36422
ENB_INTERFACE_NAME_FOR_S1_MME = "enp0s31f6";
ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_S1_MME = "192.168.12.188/24";
ENB_INTERFACE_NAME_FOR_S1U = "enp0s31f6";
ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_S1U = "192.168.12.188/24";
ENB_PORT_FOR_S1U = 2152; # Spec 2152
ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_X2C = "127.0.0.2/24";
ENB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_X2C = "192.168.12.188/24";
ENB_PORT_FOR_X2C = 36422; # Spec 36422
};
}
);
......@@ -196,7 +206,7 @@ eNBs =
MACRLCs = (
{
num_cc = 1;
local_s_if_name = "lo";
local_s_if_name = "lo:";
remote_s_address = "127.0.0.1";
local_s_address = "127.0.0.2";
local_s_portc = 50001;
......
......@@ -948,8 +948,8 @@ void init_eNB_proc(int inst) {
// Original Code from Fujitsu w/ old structure/field name
//pthread_create( &proc_rxtx[0].pthread_rxtx, attr0, eNB_thread_rxtx, &proc_rxtx[0] );
//pthread_create( &proc_rxtx[1].pthread_rxtx, attr1, eNB_thread_rxtx, &proc_rxtx[1] );
pthread_create( &L1_proc->pthread, attr0, L1_thread, proc );
pthread_create( &L1_proc_tx->pthread, attr1, L1_thread, proc);
pthread_create( &L1_proc->pthread, attr0, L1_thread, L1_proc );
pthread_create( &L1_proc_tx->pthread, attr1, L1_thread, L1_proc_tx);
}
pthread_create( &proc->pthread_prach, attr_prach, eNB_thread_prach, eNB );
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment