1. 25 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  2. 24 Sep, 2017 3 commits
  3. 22 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  4. 21 Sep, 2017 2 commits
  5. 19 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  6. 15 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  7. 14 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  8. 17 Aug, 2017 2 commits
  9. 15 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  10. 14 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  11. 13 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  12. 10 Aug, 2017 3 commits
  13. 08 Aug, 2017 1 commit
    • knopp's avatar
      L1/L2 scheduling extensions for BL/CE operation, BR random-access procedure,... · ad98f5aa
      knopp authored
      L1/L2 scheduling extensions for BL/CE operation, BR random-access procedure, BR PRACH detection. Still untested, but compilation succeeds. Missing elements in L2 - PUSCH programming for Msg3, Msg4 retransmission programming for BL/CE. DLSCH/ULSCH programming for UE-specific DLSCH/ULSCH for BL/CE
      ad98f5aa
  14. 25 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  15. 24 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  16. 19 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  17. 06 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  18. 04 Jun, 2017 1 commit
  19. 22 May, 2017 1 commit
  20. 19 May, 2017 1 commit
  21. 18 May, 2017 2 commits
  22. 13 May, 2017 1 commit
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      rewrite phy_stats_exist · 9eaee53b
      Cedric Roux authored
      We have to test that all active CCs of a given UE exist in the PHY layer.
      Maybe not the end of the story...
      9eaee53b
  23. 12 May, 2017 2 commits
  24. 03 May, 2017 1 commit
  25. 25 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  26. 17 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  27. 11 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  28. 10 Apr, 2017 2 commits
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      bugfix: increase RLC UM header size · 94f880ad
      Cedric Roux authored
      The constant RLC_UM_SEGMENT_NB_MAX_LI_PER_PDU is set to 24. This is
      too low. Running a downlink TCP iperf with a 10MHz or 20MHz cell
      leads to lots of the following warning in the log:
      
      [RLC][W][SN 792] Bad RLC header! Discard this RLC PDU (size=618)
      
      The problem is that the uplink RLC PDU contains a lot of TCP ack.
      We can see much more than 24 of them. The RLC layer is not happy
      and discards the PDU.
      
      Putting 256 for RLC_UM_SEGMENT_NB_MAX_LI_PER_PDU (arbitrarily chosen,
      big but not too big) solves the problem, at least for 10MHz.
      94f880ad
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      minor: bad comparison · fbcc9a23
      Cedric Roux authored
      it was:
      
          *num_li_pP >= RLC_UM_SEGMENT_NB_MAX_LI_PER_PDU
      
      it should be:
      
          *num_li_pP > RLC_UM_SEGMENT_NB_MAX_LI_PER_PDU
      fbcc9a23
  29. 03 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  30. 29 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  31. 28 Mar, 2017 1 commit