1. 02 Aug, 2021 4 commits
  2. 29 Jul, 2021 3 commits
  3. 28 Jul, 2021 2 commits
  4. 27 Jul, 2021 4 commits
  5. 26 Jul, 2021 3 commits
  6. 25 Jul, 2021 1 commit
    • Remi Hardy's avatar
      integration_2021_wk30 · 4bfbb6f1
      Remi Hardy authored
      MR !1206 : nr_ue_remove_high_speed_flag
      This flag is always set to 1, 
      With multiple DMRS symbols configuration, very recent DMRS containing symbol shall be for channel estimation.
      
      MR !1205 : fix-lte-ue-modem-in-docker-container
      We bind the socket to any_addr (instead of localhost), so the commands to the UE can come also from a remote machine
      
      MR !1178 : NR_CSIRS_tomerge
      Implementation of CSI RS transmission at gNB
      
      MR !1211 : develop-NSA_SA_fixes
      Small fixes for NSA and SA
      4bfbb6f1
  7. 24 Jul, 2021 1 commit
  8. 23 Jul, 2021 7 commits
  9. 22 Jul, 2021 11 commits
  10. 21 Jul, 2021 3 commits
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      bugfix: fix allocation of RBGs for retransmission · 4a2c0b1e
      Cedric Roux authored
      When there is a retransmission, we want to use the same number of RBs.
      
      The RBs are allocated by groups (RBGs).
      
      In some cases (like a cell with 25 PRBs), the last RBG contains less RBs.
      So in case of a retransmission, if this last RBG was used before we need
      to reuse it to have the same number of RBs. If not, we will use more RBs
      for the retransmission than the previous transmission.
      
      In an experiment with two UEs (quectel modules) it was seen that when a
      retransmission happens with a different number of RBs then the UE is not
      happy at all, leading to way more NACKs in the harq processes than should
      happen (actually the first NACK was not a NACK at all, but the eNB did
      interpret it as a NACK; so the next transmission should simply be discarded
      by the UE that successfully received the first transmission; instead the UE
      fails to decode the data and sends a NACK, a real one this time).
      
      Maybe it's not the correct solution, but it improve things, there are
      mu...
      4a2c0b1e
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      hack: do not use BCH RBs for DL scheduling in subframe 0 · f6e03218
      Cedric Roux authored
      The problem is that when using those RBs with MCS 28 we may exceed the
      code rate 0.93 and according to 36.213 7.1.7 the UE may skip decoding
      PDSCH entirely in this case.
      
      This is a hack. The real solution is to check that the code rate is below
      0.93 for each scheduling decision and, I don't know, reduce the MCS if the
      code rate is above, so that in the end it is below. That means that we need
      a proper resource grid for the configuration of the eNB and this is not an
      easy thing (at least from my point of view) given all the possible
      configurations for the eNB, so I prefer not to do it rather than do something
      incorrect, thus this hack.
      
      The problem of this hack is that we won't use all the available RBs for
      scheduling, potentially reducing the maximum throughput achievable.
      
      To be fixed properly at some time, by someone who understands fully the
      resource grid and all the possible combinations (fdd/tdd, number of
      antennas, whatever else).
      f6e03218
    • hardy's avatar
      [CI] for gNB Phy test : update of the execution timings ref values, according... · 59f4cfd9
      hardy authored
      [CI] for gNB Phy test : update of the execution timings ref values, according to the latest developments
      59f4cfd9
  11. 20 Jul, 2021 1 commit