- 20 Nov, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
magounak authored
-
- 18 Nov, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
- 05 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
- 28 Oct, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Sakthivel Velumani authored
-
Sakthivel Velumani authored
-
Sakthivel Velumani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
- 25 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Sakthivel Velumani authored
-
Florian Kaltenberger authored
-
- 24 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Hongzhi Wang authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
- 22 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
- 21 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
- 18 Oct, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Francesco Mani authored
-
Hongzhi Wang authored
-
- 16 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Florian Kaltenberger authored
-
- 14 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Florian Kaltenberger authored
-
- 11 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Hongzhi Wang authored
-
- 10 Oct, 2019 4 commits
- 09 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
knopp authored
-
- 08 Oct, 2019 7 commits
-
-
Turker YILMAZ authored
-
- added nr_is_ssb_slot function
-
-
-
-
- TBS calculation was performed 2 times. Once in "phy_procedures_nrUE_TX" and another in "nr_ue_ulsch_procedures". The TBS calculation was wrong in "phy_procedures_nrUE_TX" and correct in "nr_ue_ulsch_procedures". - The data generation was performed in "phy_procedures_nrUE_TX" with a wrongly calculated TBS because "ulsch_ue->nb_re_dmrs" wasn't set to a value, so the calculated TBS would be more than it should be. This doesn't create a problem in the test because the comparison between the TX and RX data is made using the correctly calculated TBS which is smaller. - Solution was to perform data generation in "nr_ue_ulsch_procedures", and remove TBS calculation in "phy_procedures_nrUE_TX"
-
-