Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 911b3877 authored by Francesco Mani's avatar Francesco Mani
Browse files

to avoid unnecessary error message for mixed slot in fdd

parent bde7e3a3
No related branches found
No related tags found
4 merge requests!1757Draft: Use pMAX value in configuration file, instead of hardcoded '23' in asn1_msg.c,!1493fix DL arq errors in UE,!1451integration_2022_wk07_c,!1361Adaptations of the MAC scheduling to support FDD
......@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void calculate_preferred_dl_tda(module_id_t module_id, const NR_BWP_Downlink_t *
/* check that TDA index 1 fits into DL part of mixed slot, if it exists */
int tdaMi = -1;
if (tdaList->list.count > 1) {
if (tdd && tdaList->list.count > 1) {
const NR_PDSCH_TimeDomainResourceAllocation_t *tdaP_Mi = tdaList->list.array[1];
AssertFatal(!tdaP_Mi->k0 || *tdaP_Mi->k0 == 0,
"TimeDomainAllocation at index 1: non-null k0 (%ld) is not supported by the scheduler\n",
......
......@@ -144,27 +144,28 @@ void calculate_preferred_ul_tda(module_id_t module_id, const NR_BWP_Uplink_t *ub
// get largest time domain allocation (TDA) for UL slot and UL in mixed slot
int tdaMi = -1;
const NR_PUSCH_TimeDomainResourceAllocation_t *tdaP_Mi = tdaList->list.array[1];
AssertFatal(k2 == get_K2(scc, (NR_BWP_Uplink_t*)ubwp, 1, mu),
"scheduler cannot handle different k2 for UL slot (%d) and UL Mixed slot (%ld)\n",
k2,
get_K2(scc, (NR_BWP_Uplink_t*)ubwp, 1, mu));
SLIV2SL(tdaP_Mi->startSymbolAndLength, &start, &len);
const uint16_t symb_tda_mi = ((1 << len) - 1) << start;
// check whether PUCCH and TDA overlap: then, we cannot use it. Also, check
// whether TDA is entirely within mixed slot, UL. Note that here we assume
// that the PUCCH is scheduled in every slot, and on all RBs (which is
// mostly not true, this is a simplification)
if ((symb_pucch & symb_tda_mi) == 0 && (symb_ulMixed & symb_tda_mi) == symb_tda_mi) {
tdaMi = 1;
} else {
LOG_E(NR_MAC,
"TDA index 1 UL overlaps with PUCCH or is not entirely in mixed slot (symb_pucch %x symb_ulMixed %x symb_tda_mi %x), won't schedule UL mixed slot\n",
symb_pucch,
symb_ulMixed,
symb_tda_mi);
if (tdd) {
const NR_PUSCH_TimeDomainResourceAllocation_t *tdaP_Mi = tdaList->list.array[1];
AssertFatal(k2 == get_K2(scc, (NR_BWP_Uplink_t*)ubwp, 1, mu),
"scheduler cannot handle different k2 for UL slot (%d) and UL Mixed slot (%ld)\n",
k2,
get_K2(scc, (NR_BWP_Uplink_t*)ubwp, 1, mu));
SLIV2SL(tdaP_Mi->startSymbolAndLength, &start, &len);
const uint16_t symb_tda_mi = ((1 << len) - 1) << start;
// check whether PUCCH and TDA overlap: then, we cannot use it. Also, check
// whether TDA is entirely within mixed slot, UL. Note that here we assume
// that the PUCCH is scheduled in every slot, and on all RBs (which is
// mostly not true, this is a simplification)
if ((symb_pucch & symb_tda_mi) == 0 && (symb_ulMixed & symb_tda_mi) == symb_tda_mi) {
tdaMi = 1;
} else {
LOG_E(NR_MAC,
"TDA index 1 UL overlaps with PUCCH or is not entirely in mixed slot (symb_pucch %x symb_ulMixed %x symb_tda_mi %x), won't schedule UL mixed slot\n",
symb_pucch,
symb_ulMixed,
symb_tda_mi);
}
}
const int n = nr_slots_per_frame[*scc->ssbSubcarrierSpacing];
nrmac->preferred_ul_tda[bwp_id] = malloc(n * sizeof(*nrmac->preferred_ul_tda[bwp_id]));
const int nr_mix_slots = tdd ? tdd->nrofDownlinkSymbols != 0 || tdd->nrofUplinkSymbols != 0 : 0;
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment