Fixes to improve CI

• Tpool: signal condition variable using condbroadcast()
• various configuration file improvements
• I have seen that the RAN-NSA-B200-Module-LTEBOX-Container's eNB log is empty, I need to debug, this is why it often fails now (apart from the fact that sometimes the gNB is in a dead lock) -> the docker-compose version was old and did not know the --no-log-prefix option that is used in the CI

added 5G-NR NSA labels

changed target branch from master to develop

@lthomas I changed this because I remarked that some Tpool worker threads would still hang on a notifF. However, after making this change, I have observed that at least once more. Do you sometimes observe the gNB being in a deadlock when stopping it?

changed the description

test runs:

• https://jenkins-oai.eurecom.fr/view/RAN/job/RAN-SA-Module-CN5G/757/
• https://jenkins-oai.eurecom.fr/view/RAN/job/RAN-SA-AmariS-CN5G/195/

Consolidated Test Results
Tested CommitID: 1dc45423
RAN-LTE-2x2-Module-OAIEPC: SUCCESS (672)
RAN-NSA-B200-Module-LTEBOX: FAILURE (1747)
RAN-NSA-2x2-Module-OAIEPC: FAILURE (647)
RAN-SA-Module-CN5G: FAILURE (758)
RAN-SA-AmariS-CN5G: SUCCESS (196)
RAN-SA-OAIUE-N310-X300-CN5G: FAILURE (434)

Consolidated Test Results
Tested CommitID: 1dc45423
RAN-LTE-2x2-Module-OAIEPC: FAILURE (673)
RAN-NSA-B200-Module-LTEBOX: FAILURE (1748)
RAN-NSA-2x2-Module-OAIEPC: FAILURE (648)
RAN-SA-Module-CN5G: FAILURE (763)
RAN-SA-AmariS-CN5G: FAILURE (198)
RAN-SA-OAIUE-N310-X300-CN5G: FAILURE (435)

removed NSA label

changed the description

requested review from @lthomas

changed milestone to %REVIEW_COMPLETED_AND_APPROVED

**Code Review by : Laurent THOMAS**

*  [X] **IMPACT on FUNCTIONAL CODE**  
   -  [X]  The code change does respect architecture/protocol split  
   -  [ ]  Abnormal exits are **NOT** properly handled  
   -  [ ]  Coding Style Issues  
      *  [ ] Added DEAD Code  
      *  [ ] Improper logging  
      *  [ ] Added useless debug code  
      *  [ ] Duplication of an existing function  
      *  [ ] Indentation is not respected  
      *  [ ] Insufficient in-code comments / code readability  
      *  [ ] Any other coding style issue  
   -  [ ]  A new tool/lib/package has been introduced (**blocking, subject to negotiation**)  
*  [ ] **TESTING** (The Merge Request requires additional testing)  
   -  [ ]  Additional testing is present in the Merge Request (Best)  
   -  [ ]  The contributor provides a framework/hints for testing  
   -  [ ]  New testing means need to be developed  
*  [ ] **DOCUMENTATION** (The Merge Request requires additional documentation)  
   -  [ ]  Feature Set documentation update needed  
      * [ ] DONE
      * [ ] NOT DONE  
   -  [ ]  Wiki tutorial / in-repo usage documentation needed  
      * [ ] DONE
      * [ ] NOT DONE  
   -  [ ]  Added/Modified/Removed script/build/runtime option(s)  
      * [ ] Help UPDATED
      * [ ] Help NOT UPDATED  

Recommendations: consider to:
it is accepted 

changed milestone to %OK_TO_BE_MERGED

mentioned in merge request !1832 (merged)

mentioned in commit 8773e423

merged