Something went wrong on our end
Forked from
oai / openairinterface5G
Source project has a limited visibility.
-
Cédric Roux authored
The old value was 6, it should be 8 because those fields are casted to 'struct DCI0_5MHz_FDD' and the like and those have a size multiple of 32 bits, that is 4 or 8 bytes as of today. (MAX_DCI_SIZE_BITS is 45, all the shifts, muls and adds lead to a value of 8 after this commit and 6 before.) The problem manifested itself with a 20MHz eNB. Push the traffic, after a while the DL harq process 0 is not used anymore. This is because DLSCH_DCI is directly followed by nb_rb in the structure UE_TEMPLATE and setting a value for harq process 7 did overwrite nb_rb[0], putting much too big values in there, leading to the scheduler to always refuse to reschedule because the required RBs are impossibly huge (I saw values of 32744, 16384, and others).
Cédric Roux authoredThe old value was 6, it should be 8 because those fields are casted to 'struct DCI0_5MHz_FDD' and the like and those have a size multiple of 32 bits, that is 4 or 8 bytes as of today. (MAX_DCI_SIZE_BITS is 45, all the shifts, muls and adds lead to a value of 8 after this commit and 6 before.) The problem manifested itself with a 20MHz eNB. Push the traffic, after a while the DL harq process 0 is not used anymore. This is because DLSCH_DCI is directly followed by nb_rb in the structure UE_TEMPLATE and setting a value for harq process 7 did overwrite nb_rb[0], putting much too big values in there, leading to the scheduler to always refuse to reschedule because the required RBs are impossibly huge (I saw values of 32744, 16384, and others).