fix(ci): explicit the slice definitions in VPP-UPF and slicing tutorials
Merged
fix(ci): explicit the slice definitions in VPP-UPF and slicing tutorials
fix_for_jinja2_smf
into
master
1 unresolved thread
1 unresolved thread
Test fix for SMF jinja MR in https://gitlab.eurecom.fr/oai/cn5g/oai-cn5g-smf/-/merge_requests/167
Explicit definition of slices in both tutorials.
Merge request reports
Activity
requested review from @kharade
assigned to @arora
It passes:
- on the current
develop
SMF image :https://jenkins-oai.eurecom.fr/view/CN5G/job/OAI-CN5G-Tutorials-Check-Dev/17/artifact/test_results_oai_cn5g_tutorials.html
- on the new SMF jinja2 image :
https://jenkins-oai.eurecom.fr/view/CN5G/job/OAI-CN5G-Tutorials-Check-Dev/18/artifact/test_results_oai_cn5g_tutorials.html
- on the current
282 290 - NRF_FQDN=oai_nrf_slice12 283 291 - REGISTER_NRF=yes 284 292 - DISCOVER_UPF=yes 293 - DISCOVER_PCF=no 294 - USE_LOCAL_SUBSCRIPTION_INFO=yes 295 - USE_LOCAL_PCC_RULES=yes 285 296 - USE_FQDN_DNS=yes 286 - NSSAI_SST1=1 287 - NSSAI_SD1=0 297 - DNN_NI0=oai 298 - TYPE0=IPv4 299 - DNN_RANGE0=12.1.1.129 - 12.1.1.224 300 - NSSAI_SST0=1 301 - NSSAI_SD0=0 @defosseu Why SD 0? This value is not possible we should change it with 0XFFFFF. Which simulator ask for that? Or change it with 1
It's the way Rohan did the slice definition:
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
mentioned in commit db261d14
Please register or sign in to reply